Home Page
Philosophy and Beliefs of Ferraro Choi
Background and History of Ferraro Choi
Design Services
Past and Present Clients
Awards and Recognitions
Sustainable Green Architecture
Design Case Studies
Portfolio of Design Projects
Publications of Ferraro Choi
Current Events and What's New at Ferraro Choi
Employment Opportunities
Search our Site
How to Contact Us

Ferraro Choi Publications        F E R R A R O   C H O I    A N D   A S S O C I A T E S    L T D
green tapa band
        PUBLICATIONS

Master Plan for the South Pole Redevelopment Project

by Joseph J. Ferraro, AIA

3. DESIGN PROCESS:

3.1 Information Gathering:

Discussions with senior NSF staff, focused on conceptual design consideration for the project. The director of NSF’s Division of Polar Programs(1), Peter Wilkness, PhD, envisioned a station that would be so environmentally benign, that if it were lifted off the polar plateau, no trace of it would be found. This shared vision was to be a driving force in the conceptual design of the station.

Secondary discussions and studies focused on determining the functional and technical requirements of a new facility that met the present and future requirements of South Pole science programs. The goal was to meet these functional requirements with a safe, efficient and environmentally sound replacement station. Requirements were obtained by interaction with the polar scientific community, the South Pole Station operations management (Antarctic Support Associates) staff, and NSF representatives. The results of these inquiries determined that the enclosed area of the present station consisted of approximately 9,380 square meters (87,000 square feet) and that the proposed design would require an enclosed area of approximately 12,952 square meters (120,000 square feet).

Figure 2: Domes and Arches

Table 1: Summary of Functional Areas

Site condition information was obtained from data compiled by the US Geological Service and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Agency as well as NSF situation reports and published scientific data.

Site conditions:                                   

Location: Geographic South Pole,   Antarctica Antarctica Location Map
Elevation: 2,835 m (9,355.5 ft) asl
Pressure: Barometric 68 kPa (680 mb)
Elev.Equiv.: 3,231 meters (10,600 ft)
Mean Temperature: -49 0 C (-56 0 F)
Record Low: -82.8 0 C (-117 0 F)
Record High: -13.6 0 C (+7.5 O F)
Average Wind: 5.4 m/s (12 mph)
Maximum Gusts: 24.2 m/s (54 mph)
Average Snow: 20 cm/ yr  (8 inches/ yr)
Velocity of Ice: 10 m/ yr (33 feet/ yr)
Direction of Ice: 32.8 0 W of Grid N

The design team made site visits to the station in November of 1992, January of 1993, and January of 1994. The first meetings acquainted the designers with the operations of the station, ongoing research projects, and day to day life at the South Pole. Photos and drawings documented existing conditions of buildings and infrastructure. An area tabulation was made for all building areas of the station and formal programming forms were completed during onsite interviews documenting the uses for each space.

High level meetings between National Science Foundation administrators and scientists brought together numerous ideas, concerns and possible design concepts the design team might consider. A Systems Management Seminar was conducted by NSF at St. Michaels, Maryland to define and coordinate all systems such as logistics, communications, and science projects to be affected by the design and construction process.

As a result of this information gathering process, a set of design parameters was developed that would guide the master plan and concept design.  They were as follows:

  • Minimize environmental impact
  • Design the facilities to meet the unique geographical, environmental and logistical constraints experienced.
  • Utilize remaining life of the existing arches for infrastructure functions (fuel storage, garage, shops, cargo storage and waste management).
  • Provide new elevated surface modules for habitation functions (eating, sleeping, recreation, research and administrative facilities).
  • Develop a phased design to minimize the impact of the construction process on science activities and station operations. Phasing would also allow various components to become operational faster.
  • Provide flexibility in the space and functions to allow for the facilities to be modified to meet the changing scientific objectives of the station.
  • Design for a station population of 150 in summer and 50 in winter.
  • Design for a facility life of 25 years.
  • Minimize life cycle costs.
  • Utilize emerging technologies (such as wind and solar energy products).

(1)The Division of Polar Programs was renamed Office of Polar Programs

Proceed to next section: 3. Design Process: 3.2 Review and Consideration of Previous Concepts

Table of Contents
1. Abstract
2. Background
3. Design Process:
    3.1. Information Gathering
    3.2. Review and Consideration of Previous Concepts
    3.3. Functional Analysis
    3.4. Conceptual Building Design
    3.5. Siting the Station
4. Conclusion/Reference

Return to Publications

Latest.Revision.04.10.2011

S u s t a i n a b l e    A r c h i t e c t u r e     *     I n t e r i o r    A r c h i t e c t u r e     *     R e s e a r c h
1240 Ala Moana Blvd, #510  Honolulu, HI 96814-4298  Ph:808.533.8880  Fx:808.599.3769  info@ferrarochoi.com ©2010